The Right to be Heard
Yesterday we talked a little bit about hate speech and social media. Today, I want to talk about the responsibilities politicians have when they use social media.
Would you consider making a donation to my campaign? I’m running a true grassroots campaign, and we’ve come a long way, but we could really use more donations to help us maintain momentum, and to show the establishment that we’re not giving up.
I think this is an interesting article about it:
Basically, one side of the coin is that, like I mentioned yesterday, the social media platforms have the ultimate authority over who and what will and won’t be allowed to participate. But when a major political figure (like a president) uses Twitter as a town hall, blocking individual users could be seen as an attack on their first amendment rights.
In one case, people who were blocked from Trump’s Twitter argued that their first amendment rights were being violated, and in another, the court had to decide whether a school board member’s Facebook page was a public forum. (They decided it was.)
Basically, the question is: are social media platforms public spaces, and do politicians have a responsibility to act as such?
We’ve all seen by now that people can get “cancelled” for something they said on Twitter 10 years ago…
Even after a giant scandal, Weiner couldn’t leave Twitter alone, because he felt that as a politician, he HAD to communicate on there.
What do you think?
Should we think of social media as public or private? Does anyone have a right to use it?
Would you also consider making a donation to our campaign? We’re really fighting an uphill battle against the Republican incumbent and Trump’s crony candidate, but we’re not giving up Ohio for Red.
Donate today if you want to see a true outsider Democrat representing Northeast Ohio.